What Happens When You Work With an Automation Agency
A week-by-week breakdown of the automation agency process. From discovery to launch, here's exactly what to expect when you hire someone to build your workflows.
You've decided to automate some of your workflows. Maybe you're drowning in manual tasks, or your lead follow-up takes too long, or you just realized you're paying three people to do work a computer should handle.
So you search for "automation agency" or "workflow automation consultant." You find a few options. But here's the problem: you have no idea what working with one actually looks like.
Most agencies show you case studies and results. Few explain the process. This post fixes that.
I'll walk you through exactly what happens when you engage an automation agency—week by week, meeting by meeting. By the end, you'll know what to expect, what you'll need to provide, and how long before you see results.
DIY vs. Agency: Quick Comparison
Before diving into the process, here's how working with an agency compares to doing it yourself:
| Aspect | DIY Automation | Agency Partnership |
|---|---|---|
| Time to launch | 2-6 months | 2-4 weeks |
| Your time investment | 40+ hours learning and building | 3-4 hours for meetings and review |
| Technical skill required | High (APIs, logic, debugging) | Low (just explain your process) |
| Ongoing maintenance | You handle everything | Often included or available |
| Cost structure | Tool subscriptions + your time | Project fee + optional retainer |
| Best for | Simple, single workflows | Complex, multi-tool systems |
| Risk of mistakes | Higher (learning curve) | Lower (experienced builders) |
If your workflows are simple and you enjoy technical work, DIY can work. For complex integrations or when time matters, agencies typically deliver faster and more reliably.
Week 1: Discovery and Audit
The first week is about understanding your current state. No building yet. Just questions and observations.
The Initial Call (60-90 minutes)
This is the diagnostic conversation. A good agency will ask questions focused on outcomes, not just features:
- What are you trying to accomplish? (Not "what do you want automated"—that's a different question)
- What does your current process look like, step by step?
- What tools are you using? How do they connect (or not connect)?
- Where do things break down? What takes too long?
- What does success look like in 90 days?
Expect to share your screen and walk through your actual workflows. Show them your CRM, your forms, your spreadsheets—the real stuff, not a cleaned-up version.
The Audit
After the call, the agency reviews what you showed them. They're looking for:
- Quick wins: Things that can be automated in days, not weeks
- Foundational gaps: Missing data, broken integrations, process holes
- Dependencies: What needs to happen before something else can be automated
- Tool limitations: Whether your current stack can support what you want
Some agencies do this audit for free as part of sales. Others charge a small fee ($500-$1,500) for a detailed assessment. Either approach is fine—what matters is thoroughness.
What You'll Receive
By the end of week 1, you should have:
- A clear scope document listing what will be built
- A prioritized roadmap (what's first, what's later)
- A realistic timeline with milestones
- A quote or estimate for the work
Week 2: Design and Mapping
Now the agency knows what you need. Week 2 is about designing how it will work.
Process Mapping
Before writing a single line of code or connecting any tools, the agency maps out the logic:
- What triggers each workflow? (Form submission, time-based, status change)
- What happens at each step?
- What data moves where?
- What are the edge cases? (What if the email bounces? What if a field is empty?)
You'll likely see this as a flowchart or diagram. Review it carefully. This is where miscommunications happen—and where they're cheapest to fix.
Tool Selection and Setup
If you need new tools, this is when they get configured. Common additions include:
- Automation platforms: n8n, Make, or Zapier (each has tradeoffs)
- Data enrichment: Clay, Apollo, Clearbit for contact data
- Notifications: Slack webhooks, email alerts, SMS triggers
The agency should explain why they're recommending each tool. "We always use Make" isn't a good answer. "Make handles this type of conditional logic better than Zapier for your use case" is.
Checkpoint Meeting (30 minutes)
Midweek, expect a call to review the design. The agency will walk through:
- The workflow logic (step by step)
- Any assumptions they've made
- Questions that came up during design
- Any scope adjustments needed
This is your chance to catch issues early. Don't just nod along—ask questions. "What happens if someone fills out the form twice?" "How do we handle leads with no phone number?"
Week 3: Build and Test
This is where the actual automation gets built.
Development
The agency constructs the workflows based on the approved design. This typically involves:
- Setting up triggers (webhooks, scheduled runs, form integrations)
- Building the logic steps (conditions, data transformations, branching)
- Connecting your tools (CRM, email platform, databases)
- Creating error handling (what happens when something fails)
You won't see much during this phase. The agency is heads-down building. A short weekly update is normal; daily check-ins usually aren't necessary.
Testing with Real Data
Before launch, the workflows get tested with real data. Not fake test records—actual leads or actual tasks from your system.
Why real data? Because test data is always clean. Real data has missing fields, weird formatting, and edge cases you forgot to mention. Testing with production data catches these issues before they affect your customers.
Expect the agency to:
- Run 10-20 records through each workflow
- Document any errors or unexpected behavior
- Fix issues and re-test
- Show you the results
Your Review (30 minutes)
You'll get a walkthrough of the finished workflows. The agency should show you:
- How to monitor the automations (where to see what's running)
- How to spot problems (what error messages mean)
- How to pause or adjust if needed
- What the ongoing maintenance looks like
Ask them to run a few records while you watch. Seeing it work in real-time builds confidence.
Week 4: Launch and Optimize
The workflows go live. But the work isn't done.
Staged Rollout
Smart agencies don't flip a switch and automate everything at once. Instead:
- Day 1-2: Run in "shadow mode" (automation runs, but doesn't take action—just logs what it would do)
- Day 3-5: Enable for a subset of records (10-20%)
- Day 6-7: Expand to full volume
This staged approach catches issues that only appear at scale. A workflow that works for 10 leads might break at 100.
Monitoring and Adjustment
The first week live, the agency monitors closely:
- Are workflows triggering correctly?
- Is data flowing to the right places?
- Are there error rates above acceptable levels?
- Is the timing right? (Emails sent too fast? Notifications delayed?)
Minor adjustments are normal. A delay that needs to be 5 minutes instead of 10. A condition that needs tweaking. This is optimization, not failure.
Documentation and Handoff
Before the agency considers the project "done," they should provide:
- Documentation of each workflow (what it does, how it's configured)
- Login credentials for any new tools
- A runbook for common issues (if X happens, check Y)
- Contact information for support questions
Real Example: Marketing Agency Automation Timeline
Here's how a recent engagement actually played out:
Client: 12-person marketing agency drowning in lead follow-up
Challenge: 300+ leads/month coming from multiple sources, 40% never contacted
Solution: Automated lead capture → enrichment → CRM routing → email sequence
The Actual Timeline
| Phase | Days | What Happened | Client Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | 1-3 | Initial call, access setup, audit | 90 minutes |
| Design | 4-7 | Process mapping, tool selection | 30 minutes (review) |
| Build | 8-14 | Workflow construction, integrations | 0 (async updates) |
| Test | 15-18 | Real data testing, bug fixes | 30 minutes (walkthrough) |
| Rollout | 19-21 | Staged launch, monitoring | 15 minutes (check-in) |
| Production | 22+ | Full automation running | Ongoing exception handling |
Total client time investment: About 3 hours over 3 weeks.
Results at 90-Day Mark
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead follow-up rate | 40% | 100% | +150% |
| Average response time | 48 hours | 4 minutes | -99.9% |
| Time spent on lead processing | 30 hrs/week | 5 hrs/week | -83% |
| Revenue from 'lost' leads | $0 | $47,000 | New revenue |
The team now spends their time on high-value conversations instead of copying data between spreadsheets.
What You'll Need to Provide
Automation projects fail when clients can't (or don't) provide what's needed. Here's what to have ready:
Access and Credentials
- Admin access to your CRM (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, etc.)
- API keys or admin access to other tools
- Permission to create webhooks, integrations, or new users
- Access to relevant email accounts or shared inboxes
Time and Availability
- 90 minutes for the initial discovery call
- 30 minutes for the design review (week 2)
- 30 minutes for the final walkthrough (week 3)
- 1-2 hours for ad-hoc questions throughout
Total: About 3-4 hours of your time over 4 weeks. If an agency needs significantly more, they're either under-prepared or building something very complex.
Decision-Making Authority
The biggest delays happen when the person we're working with can't approve decisions. Before starting, make sure you can:
- Approve new tool purchases (if needed)
- Sign off on workflow designs
- Decide on edge case handling
If you need executive approval for these decisions, include that person in the kickoff call.
What Results Look Like (Realistic Timeline)
Set expectations correctly. Here's when you'll see what:
Week 1 (Launch Week)
- Workflows running smoothly (hopefully)
- Initial time savings visible
- Some adjustment and debugging normal
Week 2-4 (First Month)
- Process kinks worked out
- Team adjusted to new workflows
- First meaningful data on performance
Month 2-3
- True time savings measurable (hours per week)
- Lead conversion impact visible (if lead gen focused)
- Error rates stabilized
- Optimization opportunities identified
Month 3-6
- Full ROI calculable
- Secondary automation opportunities clear
- System running with minimal oversight
Red Flags to Watch For
Not every automation agency delivers. Watch for these warning signs:
During Sales
- Quotes before understanding your systems
- Vague deliverables ("we'll automate your lead gen")
- No discovery process or audit
- Pushing specific tools without explaining why
- Guaranteeing specific results without seeing your data
During the Project
- Radio silence for days at a time
- Missed deadlines without communication
- "It works" without showing you proof
- Resistance to testing with real data
- Scope creep without discussing costs
At Handoff
- No documentation
- "Just email us if something breaks"
- Pressure to sign a retainer before proving value
- Inability to explain how workflows function
A good agency welcomes questions. They explain their work. They're available when things go wrong. If your agency makes you feel stupid for asking how something works, find a different agency.
Ongoing Maintenance: Build and Leave vs. Build and Support
Ask any agency upfront: what happens after launch?
Build and Leave agencies hand you the keys and move on. You own the workflows. If they break, you fix them (or hire someone else). Lower cost, but higher risk.
Build and Support agencies maintain the systems they build. Monthly retainers cover monitoring, updates, and fixes. Higher cost, but you're not on your own when something breaks.
| Model | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build and Leave | Lower total cost, full ownership | You handle all issues | Technical teams, simple workflows |
| Build and Support | Peace of mind, ongoing optimization | Monthly cost, dependency | Non-technical teams, critical systems |
Neither model is inherently better. It depends on your internal capacity. If you have technical team members who can debug workflows, build-and-leave works fine. If your team is non-technical, ongoing support is worth the cost.
Conclusion
Working with an automation agency isn't complicated, but it helps to know what's coming.
Week 1: Discovery and understanding. Week 2: Design and planning. Week 3: Building and testing. Week 4: Launch and optimization.
You'll need about 3-4 hours of your time total. You'll need to provide access, make decisions, and be available for questions. In return, you get workflows that run while you sleep, processes that don't depend on someone remembering to do them, and hours back in your week.
The best time to automate was probably six months ago. The second best time is now.
Frequently Asked Questions
Senko Duras
Founder at FlowForge. Building AI workflow automation systems for B2B companies. Helping teams eliminate manual busywork and scale smarter.
Learn More About UsReady to Automate Your Business?
Book a free discovery call to see how AtoB.digital can transform your workflows and accelerate your growth.
Schedule Your Call